![]() ![]() These may mutually eat each other up to all eternity. The spinal cord, that feeling though latent must still be there to make it act The hemispheres, and finding their performances apparently guided by feeling concludes, when he comes to ![]() The rationality of their performances can owe nothing to the feelings that Has no consciousness, and passing up to the hemispheres of man concludes that Ideas themselves, and it becomes hard indeed for a Humian to say how the notion of causalityĪrgumentum ad hominem which need not detainĬonsequence of the extension of the notion of reflex action to the higherĪ decapitated frog which performs rational-seeming acts although probably it Strip the string of necessity from between ![]() Thought to sprout out of its customary antecedent. Illegitimate outward projection of the inward necessity by which we feel each Seem to find between the terms of a physical chain of events, is an That doctrine asserts that the causality we Huxley have openly expressed their belief in Hume's doctrine of causality. That this latter part of the theory should be held by writers, who like Prof. Severally correspond awaken each other in that order. Order without mutual cohesion, because the nerve-processes to which they The feelings are merely juxtaposed in that Maintains that we are in error to suppose that our thoughts awaken each otherīy inward congruity or rational necessity, that disappointed hopes cause sadness, Is allowed to remain on board, but not to touch the helm or handle the rigging. Inert, uninfluential, a simple passenger in the voyage of life, it Unable to react upon them any more than a shadow reacts on the steps of the Feeling is a mere collateral product of our nervous processes, The theory maintains that inĮverything outward we are pure material machines. Lecture on "Body and Mind" but which found itsĮarliest and ablest exposition in Mr. Clifford fulminated as a dogma essential to salvation in a Spalding punctiliously made the pivot of all his book-notices in Nature Huxley gave such publicity in his Belfast address which the late In: Psychological Review 102(4): 757–761.Henry Quastler Adolphe Quételet Pasco Rakic Nicolas Rashevsky Lord Rayleigh Jürgen Renn Giacomo Rizzolati Emil Roduner Juan Roederer Jerome Rothstein David Ruelle Tilman Sauerīiosemiotics Free Will Mental Causation James SymposiumĪcquainted with the Conscious-Automaton-theory to which Prof. Reisenzein, Rainer/ Meyer, Wulf-Uwe/ Schützwohl, Achim (1994): James and the Physical Basis of Emotion: A Comment on Ellsworth. In: Annette Schnabel/ Rainer Schützeichel (Hg.): Emotionen, Sozialstruktur und Moderne. Emotionen in der pragmatistischen Tradition. Pettenkofer, Andreas (2012): Von der Situation ergriffen. Oatley, Keith (1992): Best Laid Schemes: The Psychology of Emotions. Leipzig: Thomas 1887 (Original: Om Sindsbevaegelser. Lange, Carl Georg (1885): Ueber Gemüthsbewegungen. 'On Some General Conditions of Brain-Activity', 'Habit', 'The Automaton. The Principles of Psychology will appeal to those with an interest in the history and development of modern psychology and related techniques. James, William (1902): The Varieties of Religious Experience. This is Part I of a fascinating insight into the history of psychological theory by American psychologist William James. James, William (1894): The Physical Basis of Emotion. James, William (1892): Psychology: A Briefer Course. James, William (1890): The Principles of Psychology. James, William (1882): On Some Hegelisms. James, William (1879): Are We Automata? In: Mind 4: 1–22. Eine Einführung in die Grundlagen der Emotionspsychologie. In: Hans-Jörg Sandkühler (Hg.): Philosophie und Wissenschaften. Heidelberger, Michael (1997): Beziehungen zwischen Sinnesphysiologe und Philosophie im 19. (1994): William James and Emotion: Is a Century of Fame Worth a Century of Misunderstanding? In: Psychological Review 101(2): 222–229. In: Ders.: Reden von Emil Du Bois-Reymond in zwei Bänden. In: Psychological Review 3: 357–370.ĭu Bois-Reymond, Emil: Über die Grenzen des Naturerkennens. In: Psychological Review 1: 553–569 Psychological Review 2: 13–32.ĭewey, John (1896): The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology. (1) Emotional Attitudes (2) The Significance of Emotions. Paris: Henry Le Gras 1649.ĭewey, John (1894/95): The Theory of Emotions. New York: Putnam.ĭescartes, René: Les passions de l’âme. (1994): Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. In: American Journal of Psychology 39: 106–124.ĭamásio, António R. Oxford: The Bardwell Press, S. 17–45.Ĭannon, Walter (1927): The James-Lange Theory of Emotions: A Critical Examination and an Alternative Theory. In: Patrick Baert/ Bryan Turner (Hg.): Pragmatism and European Social Theory. (2007): Classical Pragmatism, Classical Sociology: William James, Religion and Emotion. In: Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 29(3): 251–266.īarbalet, Jack M. (1999): William James’ Theory of Emotions: Filling in the Picture. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |